The Failed Estate
Rejuvenating Journalism in a Jaded Age
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Oh, THAT guy
This is Jim Parker, a former financial journalist and now corporate communications flak. He’s also known as Mr Denmore.
I’ve kept this blog going for 18 months as ‘Mr D’ and I plan to keep doing so. But I thought it was about time I revealed my daytime persona.
By the way, I’m neither a public servant nor an academic, so those loyal foot soldiers of Rupert can’t pin those particular hate crimes on me.
But I do have an interest in the state of journalism and I can’t see why I shouldn’t be able to express my opinion publicly.
I spent 26 years in journalism – starting in commercial radio in New Zealand, then public radio, then radio in Australia. I even worked for the ABC briefly. Most of my career, though, was in wire services – particularly Reuters (still the best news organisation in the world in my view).
My last six years in journalism were with The Australian Financial Review, our best newspaper. While my experiences there weren’t particularly pleasurable – I was associated with their less-than-stellar ventures in television and online media – I nevertheless learned much.
In 2006, I quit the media for a full-time role in corporate communications in the financial services sector. Part of my daytime job involves speaking to financial and other professionals about how the media works and what a tough gig daily journalism can be.
After four years watching the (often uninformed) commentary on blogs about journalism, I thought I would offer my own pseudonymous contribution. I wrote a few pieces for Mark Bahnisch at the now defunct Larvatus Prodeo under the title of The Failed Estate.
This eventually led to the creation of a blog of the same name in August 2010. I kept the Mr Denmore tag going not because I was evading scrutiny but because I needed to keep (and still do) my blogging persona separate from my professional persona. This is the case for many people who have something to contribute to public debate, but who are reluctant to do so for fear of compromising their paid employment.
As it is, my employers know about the blog and are happy for me to continue, providing I don’t cut across or talk about issues that compromise my paid role. So you’ll see my blog posts, written in my own time, almost always appear late on Sunday or Monday nights. You also won’t hear any “stock picks” or interest rate forecasts from me. Not allowed.
Anyway, I never hid who I was from people who asked. Quite a few former journalist colleagues were aware of who Mr D was, as did a few former contacts in economics, politics and financial markets and other bloggers.
So why did I leave till now revealing who I am? Well, it’s partly because I’ve been invited to speak at a seminar in Canberra next week along with Finkelstein inquiry assistant, Professor Matt Ricketson and digital media guru Craig Thomler. (I’m going to Canberra in my own time and at my own expense by the way - no taxpayer funds involved).
But I also agree with journalists who say that critics of the media need to be upfront about their affiliations and identify. That’s a fair call. Having said that, I think many people concerned about the drift in our political and media discourse (“drink”!) feel reluctant to contribute to the discussion because of the vitriol coming out of certain quarters. (Witness the smearing of academics recently for seeking to improve the accountability of media organisations to their readerships.)
Finally, I don’t think you stop being a journalist and seeing the world as a journalist just because you leave the paid employment of an industrial age mainstream media organisation.
In fact, for any journalists wondering about life after traditional ‘news’ journalism, you can be assured that your skills in communication, filtering, editing, writing, research and analysis are just as valuable outside the media as they are inside. (BTW, I still do some paid journalism for Radio New Zealand and for the Sydney Morning Herald, but only rarely and with full disclosure).
And the great thing about social media and blogs is that many fine former journalists and policy experts and academics can continue to write and participate in public discussions among people of all political persuasions.
More voices from all sides of the debate are what we need in a functioning democracy. Mine is only one voice and I don’t pretend it is any more important or more influential or any more valid than any other. But a diversity of views is a good thing, don’t you think?
(A final disclosure: The great man in the Mr Denmore photo is Michael Joseph Savage, the only Australian-born Prime Minister of New Zealand and the Kiwis' own version of Curtin. Yes, yes, he was a lefty).
Sunday, May 20, 2012
Why Journalists Fear Academics
What's most likely to keep journalists awake at night? That they will be 'scooped'? Please. In 2012 in the age of Twitter? Hardly. After all, they all copy and paste the same PR releases and transcripts. Nope, what really gnaws at journalists is the fear that they will be exposed as flakes, dilettantes, copycats and pretenders.
In days gone by, this wasn't a big risk. After all, academics for the most part were the only likely challengers to the self-appointed authorial voice of journalists. And we knew these sad, bearded trainspotters were locked away in their ivory towers, working on 6-12-monthly publishing cycles. Worse, their 'copy' - when it did arrive - was impenetrable, heavily footnoted and full of heavily qualifying subordinate clauses. Seven universes away, in other words, from The Herald Sun.
In days gone by, this wasn't a big risk. After all, academics for the most part were the only likely challengers to the self-appointed authorial voice of journalists. And we knew these sad, bearded trainspotters were locked away in their ivory towers, working on 6-12-monthly publishing cycles. Worse, their 'copy' - when it did arrive - was impenetrable, heavily footnoted and full of heavily qualifying subordinate clauses. Seven universes away, in other words, from The Herald Sun.
Monday, May 14, 2012
Live From Canberragrad
Friday, May 11, 2012
Spinning Wheel
A health warning to consumers of the mainstream media: When a news story starts with the words "is expected to", activate the bullshit detector. And when that news story involves forecasts about economic statistics, shift the detector to warp speed.
So it was that Aunty ABC woke me at 6am with the sombre news that Australia's unemployment rate was "expected to have jumped" in April - all the way from 5.2 to 5.3 per cent. Oh, the humanity.
So it was that Aunty ABC woke me at 6am with the sombre news that Australia's unemployment rate was "expected to have jumped" in April - all the way from 5.2 to 5.3 per cent. Oh, the humanity.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
A Day in the Life
I read the news today. Oh boy. Apparently, Australia is now a socialist dictatorship run by red rag shop stewards stealing the legitimate rewards of those with enterprise and throwing it away on the undeserving poor.
"Once again, nothing in it for me," said 'Single Dad' in the comments section of a Sydney Morning Herald analysis from Adele Ferguson describing Wayne Swan's fifth budget as 'Class Warfare'. Over at 'The Heart of the Nation', meanwhile, the splash was 'Smash the Rich, Save the Base', with Swan and Gillard seen leading an angry mob against a hammer and sickle backdrop.
"Once again, nothing in it for me," said 'Single Dad' in the comments section of a Sydney Morning Herald analysis from Adele Ferguson describing Wayne Swan's fifth budget as 'Class Warfare'. Over at 'The Heart of the Nation', meanwhile, the splash was 'Smash the Rich, Save the Base', with Swan and Gillard seen leading an angry mob against a hammer and sickle backdrop.
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Black Budget Blasts Battling Blue Bloods
Don't talk about alleged "middle class welfare" to Prudence Hetherington-Alswyth. This is a woman who already felt she had sacrificed enough. And now with Wayne Swan's heartless budget, her struggling family feels it has reached rock bottom. This is their story.
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Convergence or Submergence?
The history of media regulation in Australia is one of the communications bureaucracy playing a no-win game of catch-up with technology. Just as a regulatory regime is nailed down, another revolutionary distribution mechanism appears out of nowhere and rips up the floorboards again.
The final report of the government's Convergence Review is an attempt to future-proof the rules for a digital age in which standalone notions of print vs broadcasting have been rendered obsolete by technology that allows media to deliver text, audio, and video over wired and wireless connections.
The final report of the government's Convergence Review is an attempt to future-proof the rules for a digital age in which standalone notions of print vs broadcasting have been rendered obsolete by technology that allows media to deliver text, audio, and video over wired and wireless connections.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





